NAPNAP Posters on the Move! provides an opportunity for pediatric-focused advanced practice registered nurses to present their research or innovations in practice. We are looking for abstracts with strong clinical applicability, evidence-based practice implications, innovative role development/practice models and topics with a future oriented perspective. Abstracts must be no more than 500 words for each category and IRB name and status must be disclosed for all research proposal submissions. Students are encouraged to submit!
Applications are now open! Deadline: September 15, 2022
Clinical Research: Podium and Poster Presentations
This category allows for podium and poster presentations to showcase completed pediatric healthcare related nursing research. All research study proposals must have IRB approval and does not include evidence-based practice projects. Priority is given to research studies that correspond to NAPNAP’s 2021-2026 Research Agenda. Applicants are encouraged to write to how their work relates to the NAPNAP research agenda and the clinical or academic relevance to pediatric focused APRNs. Only individuals with completed research submissions may be eligible for our six national conference research podium presentations, which are determined by NAPNAP’s Research Committee.
Research abstracts should include the following components, with key sections bolded. Use of headers for key sections are recommended in your abstract:
- Purpose for research study
- Background and significance
- Research question(s) or hypotheses
- Methods (including design, sampling, inclusion criteria, power analysis (if needed), recruitment, information on measurement instruments, sample, IRB approval status, data analysis)
- Results: sample, outcome findings
- Discussion/conclusion (conclusions based on data and have scientific merit, future research, and clinical implications)
Note: Projects that have not been reviewed by an IRB will not be accepted.
Clinical Research in Progress Poster Presentation
This call for posters is to share the progress of ongoing research studies or unique and novel methodologic approaches and protocols in research studies. There is an expectation that results of the study are not yet available. See NAPNAP Clinical Research Study Poster application if there are results. All research in progress proposals must have IRB approval and must not include evidence-based practice or quality improvement projects. Priority is given to research topics that correspond to NAPNAP’s 2021-2026 Research Agenda. Applicants are encouraged to write how their work relates to the NAPNAP research agenda and how the results of the research in progress will impact pediatric practice or academia. Please note that this poster category is NOT eligible for our national conference research podium presentations.
Clinical Research in Progress abstracts should include the below components. Use of headers for key sections are recommended. Key sections are bolded:
- Purpose for research study
- Background and significance
- Research question(s) or hypotheses
- Methods (including design, sampling, inclusion criteria, power analysis (if needed), recruitment, information on measurement instruments, sample, IRB approval status, data analysis)
- Discussion: conclusions have scientific merit for potential future implications/impact of work
Note: Projects that have not been reviewed by an IRB will not be accepted.
Evidence-Based Practice, Quality Improvement & Practice Innovation Poster Presentations
This category allows for a variety of posters that describe the successful implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP), quality improvement (QI), innovative ideas, or the evaluation of previously implemented projects. Further possibilities include a review of the evidence, innovative practice solutions, creative management of a specific patient population, pioneering role presentations, ground-breaking programs or teaching strategies. Integrated literature reviews and case studies are also considered under this category. Applicants are encouraged to write to how their work relates to the NAPNAP research agenda and the potential clinical or academic relevance to pediatric focused APRNs.
Practice Innovation abstracts should include:
Details about the project, case, preliminary work, role innovations, target population, measurable outcomes, and any additional needed information pertinent to the project, addressing the following areas as appropriate:
- Background
- Aims of project/change
- Details of innovation or evaluation
- Outcomes
- Discussion of effects/implications, demonstration of improvement, evaluation of change, lessons learned/tips for practice, case study or a model that can be adapted or replicated by other organizations or care providers
EBP and QI projects should include the below components. Use of headers for key sections are recommended. Key sections are bolded:
- Purpose for project
- Background and significance
- Problem statement
- Methods (including design, sampling, inclusion criteria,), recruitment, information on measurement instruments, sample, IRB approval status [if indicated], data analysis)
- Results: sample, outcome findings
- Discussion/conclusion (conclusions based on data and have scientific merit, future directions, and clinical implications)
Application Requirements
The online application will request the following items:
- Proposal type: Research Study, Research in Process or Practice Innovation
- Abstract Title
- Poster Abstract (maximum 500 words)
- One open-ended discussion question
- Details of funding or support received
- Author information – include names, affiliated institutions, degrees, certifications and licensure for all authors
- Author Disclosures and Releases (for all authors)
- IRB name and status (Research proposals only)
- NAPNAP Research Agenda priority (for applicable proposals)
Research applications are sent to members of the Research Committee for blinded review and evaluation in October with selection completed by the end of October. Practice Innovation applications are sent to members of the Conference Planning, Continuing Education and Professional Issues Committees for blinded review and evaluation in October with Selection by December 1. All selected individuals will be contacted via e-mail.
Clinical Research: The following rating questions will be required of the reviewer for each assigned abstract (up to 5 points each). Max Score: 41 points.
1. Purpose of study is clearly stated.Â
2. Background and significance is well developed.
3. Research questions, or hypotheses are clearly defined.
4. Study design is described and is appropriate for research questions.Â
5. Methods are clearly written including sampling, inclusion criteria, power analysis (if indicated), recruitment, IRB status, information on measurement instruments. Data analysis is clearly defined and appropriate.Â
6. Results are presented in a clear and complete manner and answer the research questions/hypotheses.Â
7. Research outcomes have clinical or academic relevance to pediatric focused APRNs.Â
8. Discussion/conclusions/implications for practice are based on data and have scientific merit. Authors included thoughts for next steps, future research needed, and contributions to evidence in the specific area addressed.Â
9. Does the application appropriately speak to one of NAPNAP’s Research Agenda priorities? (Yes = 1/No = 0)
Research in Progress: The following rating questions will be required of the reviewer for each assigned abstract (up to 5 points each). Max Score: 36 points.
- Purpose of study is clearly stated. Â
- Background and significance is well developed.
- Research questions, or hypotheses are clearly defined.
- Study design is described and is appropriate for research questions.
- Methods are clearly written including sampling, inclusion criteria, power analysis (if indicated), recruitment, IRB status, information on measurement instruments. 6. Plan for data analysis is clearly defined and appropriate.Â
- Impact- Successful completion of the proposed project will make a contribution of high importance to pediatric practice or academia.Â
- Does the application appropriately speak to one of NAPNAP’s Research Agenda priorities? (Yes = 1/No = 0)
Practice Innovation: The following rating questions will be required of the reviewer for each assigned abstract (up to 5 points each). Max Score: 36 points.
- Purpose of project is clearly stated. Â
- Background and significance is well developed.
- Aims & Methods well described.Â
- Outcomes well describedÂ
- Describes effects/implications/next steps etc. (depending on project/poster type)
- Topic has strong clinical applicability.Â
- Topic is original, unique or different.
- Does the application appropriately speak to one of NAPNAP’s Research Agenda priorities? (Yes = 1/No = 0)
EBP and QI Projects: The following rating questions will be required of the reviewer for each assigned abstract (up to 5 points each). Max Score: 36 points.
- Purpose of project is clearly stated.Â
- Background and significance is well developed.
- Problem is clearly defined.
- Project objectives stated if applicableÂ
- Methods are clearly written including sampling, inclusion criteria, recruitment, IRB status (as appropriate) information on measurement instruments.
- Plan for data analysis is clearly defined and appropriate.Â
- Summary of key findings and discussion of relevance to pediatric practice or academia.
- Does the application appropriately speak to one of NAPNAP’s Research Agenda priorities? (Yes = 1/No = 0)Â
Individuals selected to present as a poster or podium presenter will receive a special, discounted registration fee, for the primary author only. This rate is non-transferable (it can be used ONLY by the primary presenter) and can be used for full conference registration only. In the case where the primary author cannot attend, the co-author may attend as the primary presenter. There is no additional compensation/reimbursement. It is the responsibility of the primary presenter of the accepted abstract to pay all expenses related to the organization and presentation of the poster (including shipment to and from the conference). NAPNAP does not provide travel allowance or lodging for poster or podium presentations.
All posters are acknowledged in our conference program books with only the primary presenter listed. Posters are also evaluated and scored, for the following award opportunities:
Research Poster Award: NAPNAP will recognize one research poster for excellence. Research posters are judged and scored on Background, Methods, Results/Discussion (except for Methodology posters), Visual Display and if applicable to the NAPNAP 2021- 2026 Research Agenda Priorities. The winning Research Poster will be selected by the Research Committee Chair after judging from reviewers.
Practice Innovations Poster Award: NAPNAP will recognize one practice innovation poster for excellence. Practice Innovation posters are judged and scored on Relevancy, Originality, Value and its Visual Display. The winning Practice Innovations Poster will be selected by the Conference Planning Chair after judging from reviewers.
Adolescent Health Care SIG Poster Award:
NAPNAPs Adolescent Health Care SIG will recognize an outstanding practice innovation poster that demonstrates adolescent content, is easily translatable to current adolescent health care topics, and advances overall knowledge regarding adolescent health. Winning presenter will receive $100.
The abstracts for the winning Research and Practice Innovation posters are submitted to the Journal of Pediatric Healthcare for publishing.
These abstracts and related posters depict the outcomes of research that has been sponsored by an industry. These posters are excluded from the competitive judging process, separated from our regular Research and Practice Innovation Posters and are not applicable for CE. Find out more on submitting an industry-sponsored related poster abstract or contact sdaley@napnap.org.Â
When do I need to be by my poster for the Q & A/ Meet-n-greet?
The posters will be on display on a rotating schedule during the conference week. Set-up for posters will begin at 7 a.m each morning and breakdown/removal will be at 7 p.m. in the evenings. Each poster is assigned one day for display, including the presenter Q &A hour where presenters are required to be at their poster.
Please note that NAPNAP will not be liable or responsible for returning any posters or items left unattended in the designated poster display area.Â
Can co-authors attend the Q & A session?
Yes, co-authors may attend the poster Q & A session/meet and greet. Co-authors must either be registered for the conference or have a guest badge to attend any conference-related event or session.
Â
Â
If you have any questions regarding the Research or Practice Innovation poster submission process, please contact Simone Daley at sdaley@napnap.org or 917-746-8295.
